Comments on: Transformers 2 Revenge of the Fallen – What did you think?

By: Olen Ahkcre

Olen Ahkcre — Thu, 03 Sep 2009 06:58:55 +0000

Why does Wheelie hump Mikaela’s leg?

To prove that he is a f-ck-ng machine.

Did the new robots add to the film?

They added new robots? Oh yeah, they do show up briefly don’t they. Their appearance adds to the backdrop of two warring alien factions while the main story focuses on Sam and his quest for the Matrix of Leadership. Loosing sight of the fact he already has an All-Spark fragment which could be used to bring Optimus Prime back to life.

Which was the best new character?

I would’ve said Sideswipe but he says, “D@mn, I’m good!” Since he can pat himself on the back without breaking his arms he doesn’t need to be a anyone’s favorite. Jetfire, but he got more screen time than any of the other new Autobots.

Which was the worst?

The Twins, Mudflap and Skids.

What would you have done different?

Take out the crude jokes and cheap laughs. They’re more like farts, embarrassing and they stink up an otherwise great movie.

Did the movie fly by too quickly or did you think it was too long?

Too long, because of the crude humor and some useless scenes. Too short, because we didn’t get enough character development on the Transformers. So, it’s about the right length.

Were Skids and Mudflap annoying or genuinely funny?
They weren’t annoying so much as redundant and basically useless. Sam’s mom, Sam’s roommate, Sam’s exchanges with Mikaela, Wheelie, Jetfire, Simmons, way too many clown characters. Too much comic relief… it was like the whole movie had diarrhea. It kept running to the bathroom to relieve itself and it was all crap too.

What was your biggest disappointment or favorite part?
Biggest disappointment was the Fallen. He doesn’t really do much of anything. Step on annoying cavemen, wow he is evil incarnate. Steals the Matrix of Leadership and activates the sun harvester. Like none of the other Decepticons could have done that. Only be defeated by a Prime. Megatron was wiping the floor with Prime in the first movie and Megatron calls the Fallen, master. They made Megatron weaker than Prime in the second movie in the process. But it brings the movie back into alignment with the cartoon as far as Prime can defeat Megatron in an all out fight.

By: rico

rico — Thu, 20 Aug 2009 23:59:45 +0000

Revenge of the Fallen looks more like Revenge of the Autobot Wimps… Hail Megatron!!!!!!!!

By: rico

rico — Thu, 20 Aug 2009 23:50:30 +0000

It seems like the are too many things going on at the same time. It felt like I had to watch it again so I can fully understand the movie. What was really crappy about it was the Wheelie character, and the twins were enough to give it a comedic dose. the effects were awesome, hats off to that. Prime did not look too much of a wimp and took out what? 3 decepti-chumps? Over all I give it a 3 out 5.

By: G-DOG

G-DOG — Sun, 02 Aug 2009 06:13:21 +0000

optimus Prime is my HERO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

By: Chelle

Chelle — Mon, 20 Jul 2009 01:28:34 +0000

Before I start I want to say that we know this movie is rated PG13. My boyfriend and I took our son today to see it because he is a HUGE Transformer fan. The first one was Awesome we really enjoyed it. So we thought that the second one would be great too… Don’t get me wrong we enjoyed the movie BUT the content was not suitable for a child to see. The sexual jestures were not needed at ALL. The dogs, the little blue robot, and all the cussing was very uncalled for. I agree that children are going to hear cussing but that movie had way to much in it. The new bots mudflap and skids were good to add BUT most of the cussing came from them.

Most boy children around the age 6 and up are going to want to see a movie like this. It keeps them into it and they think it is awesome with all the fighting in it. We stayed on the edge of our seats. If they come out with Transformer 3, we are uncertian if we want our 7yr old watching it. The producers should think about the age gruop that this movie attracts and produce by that.

By: Concerned Parent

Concerned Parent — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:23:47 +0000

I saw the movie and I really enjoyed it. Action from the beginning to the end, wonderful. My only problem with it is the sexual jestures with the dogs and the profanity. My 8yr old son saw it and if I had known that those scenes were in the movie I probaly would not have let him see the movie. I don’t care about it for myself but when you have young kids that want to see it, you don’t expect for these types of things in a movie. Kids are going to hear profanity everywhere they go but it would be nice if it could be toned down just a little. I’m hoping that when Transformer 3 comes that it will be just as good with less profanity and no sexual jestures. Thank you.

By: wDiaz

wDiaz — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:05:45 +0000

The movie was perfect, pretty much better than the first. For those lo class so called movie critics, first you have to understand that movies are made to entertain and detache use from our daily lives, and second movies are mesured by the level of excitmente not by how borring the are.

By: cole

cole — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 17:12:15 +0000

it was pretty good except for the recking balls humping the man thong and all the other crude stuff

By: willychong8921

willychong8921 — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 09:41:11 +0000

Its an awesome movie. Although it has certain flaws in it. First, they are too many transformers included into the movie. And pretty cumbersome for a movie that last around 2 hours. The storyline has a little off ward compare to the first movie. I really hate mudflap & Skip as they fail to actually add on the humor. Most of the funny part belongs to Leo and the Twins virtually fail to shine in the movie. I like Demolisher concept as it no longer humanoid than other transformers. In this movie, the Diceptacons have better line off appearance compare to the Autobots and I like the way the Diceptacons present thier well planned operation.

By: dog

dog — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 03:33:18 +0000

In response:
A ‘Grave Breach’ of the Geneva Convention includes acts of: willful killing, torture or inhuman treatment, willfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health. (In this case executing a subdued enemy combatant/prisoner of war)
The eight amendment of the constitution prohibits the use of “cruel or unusual punishments”. (In this case burning a captive’s eye out with a blow torch.)
I don’t give a damn how big or nasty an enemy combatant is. When it is subdued, it is subdued. It should have ended there. Further action would fall under a breach of the Geneva Convention. And in the spirit of the film series they already showed that it is possible to hold a Decepticon in captivity which would probably have been made much easier by the fact that he has been half smashed to pieces.
The appropriate punishment by US law for petty theft is six month imprisonment. Hell, grand theft only calls for imprisonment for 12 months. In the case of Wheelie I think that there are more than the two choices you present: torture him with a blow torch or ‘give him what he wants’.
Why am I not surprised that you think that it is okay for the good guy to do these things. The American military and government has colorful history committing similar acts without punishment.